<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is Black Hat SEO?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.organicapex.com/black-hat-seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.organicapex.com/black-hat-seo/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 01:07:48 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: OA</title>
		<link>http://www.organicapex.com/black-hat-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>OA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 12:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://organicapex.com/?p=179#comment-44</guid>
		<description>You have a good point there, but the question is, &quot;Is there an other side?&quot; We are being objective in out posts, we take no sides. 

&quot;There are groups of people who claim that if Black Hat SEO is illegal so is basic SEO.&quot; 

That sentence would serve as proof.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have a good point there, but the question is, &#8220;Is there an other side?&#8221; We are being objective in out posts, we take no sides. </p>
<p>&#8220;There are groups of people who claim that if Black Hat SEO is illegal so is basic SEO.&#8221; </p>
<p>That sentence would serve as proof.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

